Graham v Connor is related to which amendment of the United States Constitution?

Graham v. Connor is a landmark case that addresses issues related to the use of excessive force by law enforcement officers. The primary legal principle derived from this case is grounded in the Fourth Amendment, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. The ruling established that the amount of force used by police must be objectively reasonable in relation to the threat posed by a suspect at the time of the incident. This standard emphasizes the perspective of a reasonable officer in the same situation, thus ensuring that law enforcement actions are scrutinized based on the specific circumstances surrounding an arrest or encounter.

In essence, the case underscores the importance of not only protecting the rights of individuals but also clarifying the legal framework within which police officers operate, especially concerning their use of force. This makes the Fourth Amendment, which is aimed at preventing unreasonable governmental intrusions, the correct constitutional basis for understanding the implications of Graham v. Connor. The other mentioned amendments relate to different rights and procedures that do not directly pertain to the evaluation of police conduct in the same manner as the Fourth Amendment does in this context.