Which case law is associated with unreasonable searches and seizures under the 4th Amendment?

The case law associated with unreasonable searches and seizures under the 4th Amendment is Terry v Ohio. This landmark Supreme Court decision established the "stop and frisk" rule, allowing police officers to stop a suspect they reasonably suspect is involved in criminal activity and conduct a limited search for weapons if they believe the suspect poses a danger to themselves or others.

The ruling clarified that, while individuals have a right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, the need for police to protect themselves and the public can justify a limited intrusion when there is reasonable suspicion. This case set important precedents regarding the balance between individual rights and law enforcement needs, essentially shaping how the 4th Amendment is interpreted in terms of everyday police encounters with civilians.

In contrast to the other cases mentioned, which deal with other aspects of due process and rights within the legal system, Terry v Ohio directly addresses the limitations and allowances related to searches and seizures, making it the key case in this context.